>> THIS MEETING WILL COME TO ORR
TO ORDER. WITH THE CLERK PLEASE
CALL THE ROLE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER MOSQUEDA .
>> PRESENT.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER NELSON.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER PEDERSON .
>> PRESENT.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER MORALES.
>> CHAIR STRAUSS.
>> PRESENT.
>> WE HAVE A QUORUM. HAVE FOUR T
FOUR PRESENT.
>> WE HAVE SEVEN ITEMS ON THE
AGENDA TODAY, ALL OF THESE HAS
BEEN HEARD IN COMMITTEE PREVIOUY
COMMITTEE PREVIOUSLY SO, WE HAVO
APPOINTMENTS AND TO A DESIGNER D
DESIGNER BOARD AND, A VOTE ON
120400. A VOTE ON 120401, A
VOTE ON COUNSEL BILL 120349
MODIFY TOWNHOUSES ENDS ROW
HOUSES AND I DO NUMBER 314447.
BEFORE WE BEGIN IF THERE IS NO
OBJECTION, THE AGENDA WILL BE
ADOPTED. HEARING NO OBJECTION, E
OBJECTION, THE AGENDA IS
ADOPTED. WE ARE GOING TO OPEN
THE HYBRID PUBLIC COMMENT SEGME.
COMMENT SEGMENT. WE WILL DO IN
PERSON PUBLIC COMMENT AND THEN L
THEN VIRTUAL TESTIMONY.
>> HELLO SEATTLE. WE ARE THE
EMERALD CITY. THE CITY OF
FLOWERS AND THE CITY OF
GOODWILL. BILL TODD INDIGENOUS .
INDIGENOUS LAND. THE SEATTLE
CITY COUNCIL WELCOMES REMOTE PUC
REMOTE PUBLIC COMMENT AND IS THE
THE EAGLE TO HEAR FROM RESIDENTS
RESIDENTS OF OUR CITY. IF YOU
WOULD LIKE TO BE A SPEAKER, YOU
MAY REGISTER TWO HOURS UP PRIOR
TO THE MEETING VIA THE CITY
COUNCIL WEBSITE. HERE IS SOME
INFORMATION ABOUT THE PUBLIC
COMMENT MEETING. EACH SPEAKER
MUST CALL IN FROM THE PHONE
NUMBER PROVIDED WHEN THEY
REGISTERED ONLINE AND USE THE
MEETING ID AND PASSCODE THAT WAS
WAS EMAILED UPON CONFIRMATION.
IF HE DID NOT RECEIVE AN EMAIL
CONFIRMATION, PLEASE CHECK YOUR
SPAM OR JUNK MAIL FOLDER. A REM,
A REMINDER, THE SPEAKER MEETINGD
IS DIFFERENT FROM THE GENERAL
LISTENING LINE PROVIDED ON THE .
THE AGENDA. ONCE THE NAME OF A
SPEAKER IS CALLED, THE
MICROPHONE OF THE SPEAKER WILL E
WILL BE TAKEN OFF OF MUTE AND
YOU WILL HEAR A PRIME SAYING
THAT THE HOST WOULD LIKE YOU TO
TAKE YOUR MICROPHONE OFF MUTE.
THAT IS YOUR CUE TO SPEAK. AT
THAT TIME YOU MUST PRESS á6 AND
YOU WILL HEAR A PROMPT THAT YOUE
YOU ARE UNMUTED. YOU SHOULD
BEGIN BY STATING YOUR NAME AND
THE ITEM THAT YOU ARE ADDRESSING
ARE ADDRESSING . A CHIME WILL
SOUND WHEN THERE ARE 10 SECONDS
LEFT ON YOUR ALLOTTED TIME. THAT
THAT IS A GENTLE REMINDER TO
WRAP UP YOUR PUBLIC COMMENTS. AT
AT THE END OF YOUR ALLOTTED TIME
TIME YOUR MICROPHONE WILL BE
MUTED IN THE NEXT SPEAKER WILL
BE CALLED. ONCE YOU ARE DONE
MAKING YOUR COMMENTS, PLEASE
DISCONNECT AND JOIN US THROUGH E
LISTENING LINE OPTION. THE
COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO EE
TO ELIMINATE PUBLIC COMMENT IF
THE SYSTEM IS BEING ABUSED OR IE
PROCESS IMPEDES THE ABILITY OF
THE COUNCIL TO CONDUCT BUSINESS
ON BEHALF OF THE RESIDENTS OF
THE CITY. ANY OFFENSIVE LANGUAGT
IS DISRUPTIVE TO THESE
PROCEEDINGS OR THAT IS NOT
FOCUSED ON AN APPROPRIATE TOPIC,
TOPIC, AS SPECIFIED IN COUNCIL
ROLES MAY LEAD TO THE SPEAKER BG
SPEAKER BEING MUTED . OUR HOPE
IS TO PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR
FOR PRODUCTIVE DISCUSSIONS THATL
ASSIST ORDERLY CONSIDERATION OF
ISSUES BEFORE THE COUNCIL. THE C
THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD IS NOW
NOW OPEN AND WE WILL BEGIN WITH
THE FIRST SPEAKER ON THE LIST.
PLEASE REMEMBER TO PRESS á6
AFTER YOU HEAR THE PROMPT THAT
YOU HAVE BEEN UNMUTED.
>> WE DO HAVE SEVERAL PEOPLE
PRESENT IN CHAMBERS. ONLY WHAT
IS FIND TO SPEAK SO FAR. WE ARE
GOING TO HAVE TWO MINUTES TO SP.
TO SPEAK. UP FIRST IS SARA
WATKINS. WELCOME. FOR THOSE ONE
THOSE ONLINE, FIRST IS MEGAN
CREWS FOLLOWED BY ALICIA RUIZ --
AND YOU WERE NOT PRESENT SO IF
YOU ARE PLANNING TO PARTICIPATE,
PARTICIPATE, PLEASE CALL IN.
>> A HOLD ON AND WE WILL TURN ON
ON THE MICROPHONE.
>> THANK YOU, FOR HAVING ME TOD.
I'M SARA WATKINS AND I AM HERE
TO TALK ABOUT CB 120400. THAT
IS THE TREE FRIENDLY AMENDMENT
AND DRAWING ATTENTION TO THE
FACT THAT IT HAS BEEN SIGNIFICT
OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS. I HAVE T
SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THE HOT SPOTS
SPOTS THAT WE ARE HAVING IN
AREAS WHERE TREES ARE NOT CONSI.
NOT CONSISTENT. THERE IS NOT ENH
PLANTING OR RETENTION IN THE
CITY. IT IS BECOMING
INCREASINGLY HARD TO LIVE WITHOT
LIVE WITHOUT AIR CONDITIONING. I
I LIVE IN AN APARTMENT COMPLEX D
IT GETS SO HOT THAT WE HAD TO GO
GO STAY WITH FRIENDS FOR A
COUPLE OF NIGHTS. I CAN'T WALK
MY DOG ON SUNDAYS BECAUSE THE
CONCRETE IS SO HOT. THIS WILL
AFFECT NOT ONLY MY COMMUNITY BUT
MAJOR COMMUNITIES OF COLOR. IT
IS REALLY IMPORTANT THAT WE REQE
WE REQUIRE MANDATORY RATHER THAL
THAN OPTIONAL TREEPLANTING AND
WE ALLOW VERTICAL STACKING OF
DWELLINGS. IS SOMETHING THAT WE
NEED TO THINK ABOUT NOW. THE
PROBLEM IS RIGHT AWAY. IF WE
DON'T DO SOMETHING SOON IT WILL
BE A BAD SITUATION THAT WILL
IMPACT THE P BOWL THAT ARE THE
POOREST IN OUR SOCIETY AND WE
WILL NOT SEE IT DIRECTLY BUT WE
WILL SEE IT LONG TERM. WHEN YOU
TO PROTECT OUR CITY AND SERVE
OUR PEOPLE. PLEASE KEEP TREES
AROUND FOR EVERYBODY. IT IS IMPT
THAT WE DO THIS. THANK YOU, FOR
YOUR TIME.
>> JUST TO CLARIFY, YOU ARE
SPEAKING TO THE BILL ABOUT VIRTL
ABOUT VIRTUAL HYBRID -- CB
120400?
>> YES.
>> WE HAVE NO ONE ELSE IN
CHAMBERS. SEEING THAT WE ARE
GOING TO MOVE FORWARD. MEGAN
CREWS YOU ARE UP NEXT FOLLOWED Y
FOLLOWED BY ALICIA RUIZ. AND,
COUNCIL MEMBER NELSON DID JOIN.
JOIN US. IT SEEMS THERE WAS A
MICROPHONE ISSUE BUT SHE IS HER.
IS HERE. MEGAN CREWS, I SEE YOU
ARE HERE.
>> I AM SPEAKING TODAY ON CB
120401 . MY NEIGHBORS AND I ARE
ENGAGED IN AN APPEAL AND WE WANT
WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE
PEOPLE THAT THIS LEGISLATION
ATTACKS AND ITS QUESTIONABLE
ORIGIN. THIS IS A LANDMARK THAT
HAS BEEN HERE SINCE 1915. THE
BUILDING WAS RENOVATED AS AN AFE
AN AFFORDABLE ALTERNATIVE TO
LUXURY CONDOS FOR THOSE THAT WOK
DOWNTOWN. IT HAS KEPT THAT CHAR.
THAT CHARACTER. WE ARE THAT ELUE
SEATTLE UNICORN WITH CONSTANT
EPENESA DAYS. WE HAVE CHILDREN,
RETIREES AND MANY WORK FROM HOM.
FROM HOME. THE ONE THAT WE ARE G
INCLUDES EXTREME LOSS OF DAYLIGT
OF DAYLIGHT AND A MASSIVE LIGHT
FEATURES SHINING INTO OUR HOME
SET NIGHT. THE DEVELOPER JOSH
AND 40% OF OUR RESIDENCES TO THT
OF LIGHT IN A DUMB MOVIE THEATE.
MOVIE THEATER. IN HIS DECISION E
STATED THAT WE HAD "DEMONSTRATED
"DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANT IMPT
OF LOSS OF LIGHT." HE TOLD THE
CITY AND DEVELOPERS THEY SHOULD
HAVE PROVIDED STUDIES RATHER
THAN TRYING TO, "WHAT LITIGATE
THEIR CIVIL DUTIES. WELL THEY
SOLVE THE PROBLEM BY WORKING WIH
WORKING WITH DEVELOPERS TO
QUIETLY SPONSOR THIS AMENDMENT
IN THE FINAL DAYS OF THE STATE
LEGISLATURE. LET THAT SINK IN.
WHEN TOLD THEY WERE WRONG BY A
CITY ENTITY, LAND-USE FFICIALS
WENT AROUND THESE RIGHTS. THE AT
IS BEING USED TO PREVENT US FROM
US FROM APPEALING OUR CASE.
WHETHER YOU CARE ABOUT LIGHT,
THIS IS A TRAVESTY. AS ELECTED
LEADERS WE COUNT ON YOU TO LEVEL
LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD. PLEASE
CONSULT EXPERTS TO CRACK CODES
AND REDUCE STANDARDS THAT
PROTECT ALL INTEREST. THANK YOU.
YOU.
>> UP NEXT WE HAVE ALICIA RUIZ.
ALICIA, I SEE YOU THERE. PLEASS
PLEASE PRESS á6.
>> HELLO. CAN YOU HEAR ME?
>> WE CAN. TAKE IT AWAY.
>> I WILL KEEP THIS SHORT AND
SWEET. I AND NO I HAVE SPEAKINGH
SPEAKING WITH ALL OF YOU
INDIVIDUALLY. MY NAME IS ALICIAZ
AND I AM HERE TODAY TO
ENTHUSIASTICALLY SUPPORT
COUNSEL BILL 120394. THIS, WE
HAVE WORKED ON THIS LEGISLATION
FOR OVER THREE YEARS. WE ARE EXD
TO SEE IT COME TO COMMITTEE.
THIS WILL STREAMLINE THE PROCESS
TO MAKE BUILDING HOMES AND TOWS
AND TOWNHOMES FASTER AND LESS
EXPENSIVE AND REALLY, THIS BILL
DOES WHAT BUILDERS ARE ALREADY G
BUT THEY HAVE TO JUMP THROUGH A
LOT OF EXPENSIVE HOOPS THAT ARE
UNNECESSARY AND CREATE MORE WORR
CITY WORKERS. WE HOPE THAT YOU
WILL SUPPORT THIS BILL. WE
SUPPORT AMENDMENT 1 AND DO NOT
SUPPORT A MOMENT 2 THAT WOULD
TURN THESE NEEDED CHANGES INTO A
INTO A PILOT PROJECT. WE DON'T
FEEL THEY NEED TO BE STUDIED.
THANK YOU, FOR YOUR TIME.
>> THANK YOU. >
>> UP NEXT WE HAVE DAVID MORNIN.
DAVID MORNING. DASHES NOT PRESET
SO PLEASE CALL INTO THE LINE
THAT WAS PROVIDED TO YOU IN YOUR
YOUR EMAIL. DAVID, PLEASE TAKE
IT AWAY.
>> HELLO I AM DAVID TRINITY FOR
REPRESENTING TREE TOO. [
INDISCERNABLE ] TOWNHOUSE REFORM
FACT NUMBER ONE, 150,000 TREES
WITHIN THE NEXT 15 MONTHS TO
ACHIEVE OUR CANOPY COVER AND THT
IS 1000 ACRES OF TREES. THE TRET
TREE COUNT DASHES THROUGH
LEGISLATION AND PRIVATE
RESIDENCE TREES. THIS ONLY PROVS
ONLY PROVIDES 12% CANOPY COVER.
-- ONLY ONE TREE WAS RETAINED
AND 42 TREES WERE REMOVED. THATS
YOU THE TREND. NUMBER THREE, AS
WAS JUST MENTIONED, SO THAT LOT
SEGREGATION DEVELOPMENT, TECHNI,
DEVELOPMENT, TECHNIQUES, DON'T
COST ANY MORE TIME AND MONEY.
SO, LET'S ELIMINATE THIS
PROVISION SO THIS DOES NOT HAPPN
ANYMORE. IN FACT NUMBER FOUR,
THERE ARE MORE CONDOMINIUMS BEIG
CREATED THAN EVER BEFORE SO WE
CERTAINLY CAN DO THE AMENDMENTS
AS SPECIFIED. WE ALL LIVE TREES.
I ALSO LOVE TOWNHOUSES. WE WANT
WANT TO SHOW THAT OUR CODE IS
WHERE YOUR HEARTS ARE. IT TAKES
400 TOWNHOUSES TO BE BUILT AT
MARKET RATE IS $60 PER SQUARE
FOOT TO GET $10 MILLION.
>> THANK YOU, DAVID. IF YOU HAVE
HAVE MORE COMMENTS, PLEASE EMAIL
EMAIL THEM INTO THE COMMITTEE.
UP NEXT IS IT JUDY FOLLOWED BY .
BY BERNARD. JUDY, THERE YOU ARE.
TAKE IT AWAY AT YOUR
CONVENIENCE. WELCOME.
>> THANK YOU. I AM TALKING ABOUT
CB 120394 AND SUPPORTING
AMENDMENT 2. I WOULD JUST PREFR
JUST PREFER THAT THE COMMITTEE
AND THE COUNCIL SHOULD REJECT
THE ZONING CHANGES REGARDING
TOWNHOUSES UNTIL THERE IS A REAL
TO ASSURE THAT THESE TOWNHOUSESE
TRULY AFFORDABLE FOR MIDDLE ANDW
INCOME FAMILIES. THAT IS WHAT WE
WE REALLY NEED IN SEATTLE. I WAS
WAS LOOKING AT THE MATERIALS
THAT WERE PROVIDED AND NOTICED
THAT ALL THAT IS SAVED BY GIVING
GIVING THIS BENEFIT TO
DEVELOPERS IS TO ADD ANOTHER UNT
ANOTHER UNIT AT A COST THAT WILE
REMOVED OF $200,000. MY
EXPERIENCE AROUND HERE IS THAT
THE TOWNHOUSES ARE REALLY CRAMMD
REALLY CRAMMED INTO EVERY LOT.
THEY HAVE DESTROYED TREES
THROUGHOUT THE CITY. THEY DO NOT
NOT HAVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. AND
AND WE ARE JUST GOING TO TALK
ABOUT HUGE BOONDOGGLE THE GOES
TO THE DEVELOPERS HERE. LIKE,
THE MASTER BUILDERS. I DID NOT R
A WORD FROM THEM ABOUT HOW THESE
HOW THESE WOULD BE AFFORDABLE.
BECAUSE THEY WANT. AT THE VERY T
VERY LEAST I HOPE YOU WILL
SUPPORT AMENDMENT TWO. THIS WILL
WILL HELP US SEE IF THIS
AMENDMENT WILL ACCOMPLISH WHAT
NEEDS TO BE DONE. WHICH I
SINCERELY DOUBT. BUT I WILL
SUPPORT THIS BECAUSE I'M SURE
YOU WON'T REJECT IT ALTOGETHER.
THANK YOU, VERY MUCH.
>> THANK YOU, JUDY. UP NEXT IS
BARBARA BERNARD. BARBARA, TAKE
IT AWAY, AT YOUR CONVENIENCE.
WELCOME.
>> THANK YOU. I AM BARBARA BERND
BARBARA BERNARD CALLING ABOUT
COUNSEL BILL CB 120394. ONLY
MOVED TO SEATTLE IN 2015 IT WAS
IMPORTANT FOR US TO NOT BUY IN
AN AREA THAT WAS CONTRIBUTING TO
GENTRIFICATION. WE MADE A
CHOICE TO BUY IN A MULTIFAMILY
TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT SO THERE
WAS NO DISPLACEMENT AND IT WAS
FOUR-STAR GREEN RATED. WHAT WE
WERE NOT PRINT PAIRED FOR HIS
BECAUSE THERE WAS A LOT THIS
THAT WAS CLEAR-CUT THAT THERE
WOULD BE A LACK OF TREE CANOPY
COVER AND THAT WOULD CREATE A
TEMPERATURE SHIFT DURING THE SU.
THE SUMMER. THE TEMPERATURES GOP
OVER 85 DEGREES INSIDE AND ONE
SIDE OF OUR HOME NO LONGER HAS Y
HAS ANY TREE COVER. RELUCTANTLY
AND UNFORTUNATELY WE NEEDED TO
HAVE AN AIR CONDITIONER
INSTALLED BECAUSE OF THE INTENS.
INTENSE HEAT. WE WERE NOT ABLE
TO AFFORD THIS OPTION AND IT IS
NOT AFFORDABLE FOR MOST PEOPLE
BUT IT WAS NECESSARY TO STAY IN
OUR UNIT SO NOW, OUR GREEN
TOWNHOME IS NOW CREATING
ADMISSIONS BECAUSE OF THE LACK
OF TREES. I HOPE THAT IF YOU
MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS BILL THAT
THAT THERE WILL BE AMENDMENTS
THAT REQUIRE RETENTION OF TREESD
ADDITIONAL TREEPLANTING IN HIGHY
OR MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS. THANK .
THANK YOU. >
>> UP NEXT IS MARTHA BASKIN. YOU
YOU WILL BE FOLLOWED BY LOGAN M.
LOGAN MacARTHUR. HELLO MARTHA.
SPIKE THANK YOU, ALL. I AM
SPEAKING FOR TREE FRIENDLY AMENS
FRIENDLY AMENDMENTS AND THAT ISL
IS BILL 120394. MANY OF US ARED
ABOUT THE LACK OF AFFORDABLE HOG
AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND THE
FLAUNTING OF TREE CANOPY AND THE
THE BENEFIT IT PROVIDES. THE
TREES FILTER AIR FOR EVERYONE
AND THEY NEED TO BE RETAINED
WHERE THEY ARE TO GET A LITTLE T
MORE EQUITY. IF THE LEGISLATION
IS APPROVED WITHOUT RE-FRIENDLY
AMENDMENTS THE PROBLEM WILL GET.
GET WORSE. I AM DOUBTFUL THAT
ANY OF THE HOUSING, THE TOWNHOMS
THE TOWNHOMES PROPOSED WILL BE .
BE AFFORDABLE. I WOULD REALLY
LOVE TO SEE THAT BUT AFFORDABLE
TO SOMEONE WHO WORKS THAT DIGS
HAMBURGERS OR IS AN ASSISTANT AT
AT THE SCHOOL SYSTEM WOULD BE
SOMETHING AROUND $100,000 AND I
DOUBT WE WILL SEE THAT. SO I
ENCOURAGE THE COUNCIL TO SEE,
THAT WE NEED TO KEEP MATURE
TREES INTO OUR PROPERTY. ALLOW
VERTICAL STACKING OF TOWN HOUSES
HOUSES TO LEAVE MORE GROUND. SOT
SO THAT SHE TREES CAN GROW FOR
THE SURVIVAL OF PEOPLE.
>> UP NEXT WE HAVE NEW TO INGRAM
AND ANYONE ELSE IN THE CHAMBERS
CHAMBERS THAT WISHES TO SPEAK.
>> HELLO. MY NAME IS NEWT AND I
AM A PUBLIC HEALTH DOCTOR WITH
50 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE. SECTION
2505 SIX ADH WOULD EXEMPT --
DECISIONS REGARDING LOSS OF FIG.
OF FIGHT. LAST WEEKEND I SENT
YOU A LINK AS TO WHY THEY SHOULD
SHOULD BE REJECT IT FOR
SCIENTIFIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE
REASONS. I HAVE LEARNED THAT JOH
THAT JOSH CONSIDERS THIS
TRIVIAL. THAT IS WHY IT IS PART
OF THIS OMNIBUS BILL. LOSS OF
LIGHT IS NOT TRIVIAL. YOU CANNON
SEE THE SKY FROM THE BUILDING
BECAUSE THERE ARE TOWERS DIRECTY
TOWERS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THEM
THEM AND WE WILL SUFFER HEALTH
EFFECTS AS A RESULT OF THIS.
SDCI [ INDISCERNIBLE - MUFFLED
] TECHNICAL EXPERTISE -- [
INDISCERNIBLE - MUFFLED ] --
THE COUNCIL ADOPTS THIS ON THE
SIDE OF AN EQUITY. [
INDISCERNIBLE - MUFFLED ] --
THAT HAVE LOW INTEREST IN OUR
NEIGHBORHOODS. I URGE YOU TO
REJECT THIS.
>> THANK YOU, NEWT. NEXT IS
LOGAN MacARTHUR. LOGAN IS THE
FINAL SPEAKER TODAY. LOGAN, ICU.
PLEASE PRESS á6 TO COME OFF
MUTE. WELCOME.
>> CAN YOU HEAR ME?
>> YES.
>> I AM LOGAN AND I AM CALLING
TECHNICALLY ABOUT CB 120394 AND
ABOUT PROMOTING RESIDENTIAL
DENSITY AS MUCH AS WE CAN
REASONABLY GET IN SEATTLE.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS NOT GOING
TO BE PRACTICAL WHEN THE ONLY
DENSE HOUSING THAT PEOPLE CAN
GET IS -- OF THE TIME BECAUSE
DEVELOPERS ONLY CREATE THE
LARGEST STRUCTURE THE CAN TO
MAXIMIZE REVENUE BUT IF YOU SPRD
YOU SPREAD DENSITY AROUND THE C,
SMALLER DEVELOPERS CAN BUILD BUS
BUILD BUILDINGS AND HOMEOWNERS
CAN BUILD DETACHMENTS AND THIS
WILL ALLOW PEOPLE TO FREE UP THE
THE COMPETITION FOR HOUSE AND
THAT THE CITY IS STRUGGLING
WITH. I GUESS THAT IS IT.
>> WE APPRECIATE YOU CALLING IN.
IN TODAY. ANTHONY, CAN YOU PLEAE
DOUBLE CHECK TO MAKE SURE NOBODY
NOBODY ELSE IS SIGNED OUT. UP.
IT SEEMS WE HAVE NO ADDITIONAL
SPEAKERS REMOTELY AND IN PRESS .
PRESS AND. THE NEXT ARE
APPOINTMENTS TO THE DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD. YOU PLEASE READ E
SHORT TITLES OF THE RECORD.
>> THESE ARE ITEMS NUMBER 02382
AND 02383 . THIS IS THE
APPOINTMENT OF GARGI KADOO AS
MEMBER, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD,
FOR A TERM OF APRIL 3, 2023 . A,
. AND, APPOINTMENT NUMBER 02383
. THAT IS APPOINTMENT OF
BRITTANY PORT AS MEMBER, DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD, FOR A TERM TO
APRIL 3, 2024. .
>> SO, WE HAVE IT SHELLEY BOLSER
BOLSER HERE AND SHE'S GOING TO
SPEAK TO WHY EACH OF THESE PEOE
WOULD LIKE TO JOIN THE DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD.
>> I WANT TO GIVE YOU A QUICK
REMINDER AS TO WHAT THE DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD IS AND I WILL INVE
WILL INVITE GARGI KADOO AND
BRITTANY PORT TO INTRODUCE
THEMSELVES. WE WANT TO -- AND
MAKE SURE THAT FITS INTO
EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS AND
PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY LIKE ZONING
REQUIREMENTS TO MEET THE USE
CODE AND IMPROVE COMMUNICATION
AND UNDERSTANDING AMONG
DEVELOPERS, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND
THE CITY. THE DESIGN REVIEW
BOARDS ARE INTEGRAL TO THIS WOR.
THIS WORK. DESIGN REVIEW REQUIRS
REVIEW REQUIRES -- AND WE HAVE
EIGHT DESIGN REVIEW BOARDS.
THERE ARE FIVE VOLUNTEER MEMBERS
VOLUNTEER MEMBERS ON EACH BOARD
AND OF TWO TWO BOARDS. THE
VOLUNTEERS ARE APPOINTED BY THE
MAYOR AND COUNCIL AND THEY REVIW
THEY REVIEW LARGER DEVELOPMENT
ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. EACH BOARD
MEETS UP TO TWO TIMES PER MONTH
IN THE EVENINGS AND THE
SYNTHESIZED COMMUNITY INPUT,
THEY PROVIDE GUIDANCE AND
RECOMMEND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
APPROVAL IF NECESSARY TO MEET
THE GUIDELINES AND THAT WOULD BE
BE AT THE FINAL RECOMMENDATION
MEETING AND THEY ENSURE FAIR
CONSIDERATION OF THE GUIDELINES.
THE GUIDELINES. TODAY WE HAVE
GARGI KADOO AND BRITTANY PORT .
GARGI KADOO, WILL YOU PLEASE
INTRODUCE YOURSELF ?
>> HELLO EVERYONE. I AM GARGI
KADOO. I AM AN ARCHITECT AND D.
AND DESIGNER. THE REASON THAT IM
I AM INTERESTED IN BEING ON THEN
REVIEW BOARD IS BECAUSE, I HAVE
HAVE CALLED SEATTLE HOME FOR
FOUR YEARS NOW AND I AM LOOKINGD
LOOKING FORWARD TO SERVING THE
CITY THAT I LOVE AND THAT I CALL
CALL HOME. THANK YOU.
>> WONDERFUL.
>> WONDERFUL. GARGI, I SEE THE
ENCODE THE PACKET THAT YOU ARE
PART OF MULTIPLE PROJECTS. CAN
YOU SHARE WITH ME A LITTLE BIT
ABOUT HOW YOU SEE THE DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD INTERACTING WITH
PROJECTS THAT YOU WORK ON .
>> I HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THE
BUILDING AND EVERYTHING BETWEEN
THE BUILDINGS. I THINK MY AYE
EYE FOR THE MACRO AND THE MICRO
WILL BE GIVING RECOMMENDATIONS
TO THE BUILDING COMING IN FOR R.
FOR REVIEW.
>> THAT IS WONDERFUL AND WE ARE
EXCITED TO HAVE YOU JOIN US.
>> THANK YOU.
>> UP NEXT I BELIEVE IS BRITTANY
IS BRITTANY PORT. IS THAT
CORRECT? HELLO, BRITNEY.
>> HELLO.
>> HELLO. MY NAME IS BRITTANY
PORT AND HAVE EIGHT YEARS OF PLG
EXPERIENCE AND I WAS MOSTLY
RECENTLY A PROJECT MANAGER AT
THE CIVIL ENGINEERING FIRM. I HE
WORKED FOR PIONEERS AS WELL AS
-- CURRENT AND LONG-RANGE PLANNG
LONG-RANGE PLANNING. I PREPAREDH
PREPARED BOTH PRIVATE
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FOR
COMMERCIAL AND EXTREMIST
DEVELOPMENTS, RESIDENTIAL DEVEL,
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS,
DIVISIONS AND I HAVE WORKED ON E
ON THE OTHER SIDE OF REVIEWING T
REVIEWING DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATIONS. I AM REALLY EXCITD
TO SERVE ON THIS DESIGN REVIEW
BOARD IN TRIBUTE TO THE WORK OF
THE BOARD AND ENSURE DESIGN
STANDARDS ARE MET AS WELL AS THE
THE DESIGN BEING SENSITIVE AND
IN CONTEXT OF THE EXISTING
CONTEXT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD I
LIVE IN AND USING MY SKILLS AS R
A PLANNER FOR THE COMMITTEE.
>> WONDERFUL.
>> WONDERFUL. WE ARE EXCITED TO
HAVE YOU ON BOARD. I SEE YOU HAE
GOT A LOT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF
PROJECTS HERE. SOME -- FROM YOU,
YOUR EXPERIENCE, WHAT ARE YOU
LOOKING FORWARD TO SHARING IN
YOUR ROLE?
>> I HAVE A PASSION FOR
SUSTAINABILITY AND LOW IMPACT
DEVELOPMENT AND I ENJOY PREPARIG
ENJOY PREPARING DEVELOPMENTS
APPLICATIONS AND PREPARING THEM.
I THINK IT WILL BE A FUN
OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT IN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD THAT I LIVE IN.
>> I NEED TO SAY THANK YOU TO
GARGI KADOO AND BRITTANY PORT
BECAUSE THIS IS VOLUNTEER WORK
THAT YOU ARE NOT BEING PAID FOR.
FOR. SO PLEASE DON'T ALLOW UNNEY
ALLOW UNNECESSARY DELAYS TO
OCCUR IN YOUR ROLE ON THE DESIGN
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD BECAUSE, WE
WE ARE CURRENTLY -- WE DON'T HAE
ENOUGH HOUSING IN SEATTLE AND WE
AND WE NEED TO BUILD IT AS FAST
AS POSSIBLE. THANK YOU, FOR YOUK
IN YOUR VOLUNTEER SERVICE. WE
LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING YOU AT FL
COUNCIL NEXT TUESDAY. YOU DO NOT
NOT HAVE TO ATTEND. WE WILL VOTE
VOTE YOU IN THEN.
>> WONDERFUL. THANK YOU. >
>> A DO HAVE SOME PROCEDURAL
ASPECTS. ANYTHING ELSE?
>> I DO NOT HAVE ANYTHING ELSE
TO SHARE AND I JUST WANT TO SAYK
YOU FOR MOVING THIS THROUGH
QUICKLY. BOTH OF THESE POSITIONS
POSITIONS ARE BEING APPOINTED
OUTSIDE OF THE REGULAR CYCLE BEE
WE HAVE TWO THEY CAN SEIZE ON
THE BOARD THAT WE NEED TO SELL
SO WE CAN CONTINUE TO MOVE PROJS
THROUGH THE REVIEW PROCESS.
>> I
>> I MOVED TO RECOMMEND 02382
AND 50 TWO 02383. IS THERE A
SECOND?
>> I SECOND.
>> THERE HAS BEEN AN MOTION AND
AND A SECOND ON ITEMS NUMBER
02382 AND 02383 . CAN WE PLEASE
CALL THE ROLE.
>> ONE MOMENT. THERE IS A
TECHNICAL ISSUE.
>> WE ARE NOW AT THE TIME WHEN
WE ARE GOING TO VOTE. WILL THE
CLERK PLEASE CALL THE ROLE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER MOSQUEDA.
>> AYE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER NELSON.
>> AYE.
>> MORALES.
>> YES.
>> PEDERSON.
>> AYE.
>> IT STRAUSS.
>> AYE
>> THE MOTION PASSES. THESE WILL
WILL BE AT FULL COUNCIL FOR A FL
VOTE. AT LET'S MOVE ON TO ITEM R
THREE. THAT IS A POSSIBLE VOTE N
VOTE ON CB 120400 AND THAT IS AN
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO LAND
USE AND ZONING UPDATING
REGULATIONS TO ALLOW VIRTUAL
MEETINGS FOR THE DESIGN REVIEW .
REVIEW PROGRAM. WE ARE PLEASE
READ OUT OUT LOUD?
>> THIS IS AN ORDINANCE RELATING
RELATING TO LAND USE AND ZONING.
>> WE HAVE THIS ITEM IN COMMITTE
LAST WEEK. IS THERE ANYTHING FUR
THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADD OR,
COUNCIL MEMBERS CAN'T YOU HAVE
FURTHER QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS BI?
THIS BILL?
>> I WILL JUST REMIND THE
COMMITTEE THAT THERE IS AN
AMENDMENT THAT IS ATTACHED TO
THE AGENDA THAT LARGELY SPELLS T
SPELLS OUT THE CURRENT FACTUAL
STATE OF AFFAIRS WHEN IT GOES TO
TO THE CURRENT STATE OF AFFAIRS.
[ INDISCERNABLE ]
>> THANK YOU, FOR MAKING THAT
CLARIFICATION. ARE THERE ANY QUS
ON THE AMENDMENT OR THE BILL?
GORDON, ANYTHING ELSE YOU WOULD
LIKE TO ADD?
>> I WAS JUST INTERESTED IN IF U
HAD ANY QUESTIONS OR FOLLOW-UP.
>> WITH THAT, I AM GOING TO MOVE
MOVE THE BILL AND THEN MOVE THE.
FIRST I WILL MOVE THAT THE
COMMITTEE PASS 120400. IS THEREA
SECOND.
>> I SECOND.
>> IT HAS BEEN MOVED AND
SECONDED. AT THIS TIME --, DO
YOU FEEL LIKE YOU NEED TO SHARE
A SCREEN, KETIL COST OF THE COME
CAN SEE THE AMENDMENT BEFORE U.
BEFORE US.
>> CAN EVERYBODY SEE THAT?
>> YES, WE CAN.
>> THIS IS AMENDMENT ONE TO CB
120400. THE BILL ASSUMES THAT
THE MAYOR WOULD HAVE LIFTED THEY
THE EMERGENCY PROCLAIMED BY THER
MAYOR DURKAN. THIS EMERGENCY IS.
IS ONGOING. THIS JUST PROVIDES N
ADDITIONAL ENTER DUCT DURING STT
DURING STATEMENT THAT LAYS OUT
THE COUNCIL INTENT TO CONTINUE H
CONTINUE WITH ONGOING COMPLIANCE
COMPLIANCE WITH THE VIRTUAL
MEETINGS ACT.
>> ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS AMENDM?
THIS AMENDMENT? THE AMENDMENT
HAS BEEN MOVED AND SECONDED.
WILL THE CLERK PLEASE CALL THE E
ON THE ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT
ONE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER MOSQUEDA.
>> AYE .
>> COUNCIL MEMBER NELSON.
>> AYE .
>> COUNCIL MEMBER PEDERSON.
>> AYE.
>> VICE CHAIR MORALES.
>> YES .
>> STRAUSS.
>> YES.
>> THE MOTION CARRIES AND
PASSES. THE AMENDMENT PASSES.
ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS ON THE
BILL AS AMENDED? SEEING NON-,
THE BILL HAS BEEN MOVED AND
SECONDED. WILL THE CLERK PLEASE
CALL THE ROLE ON THE RECOMMENDAN
THE RECOMMENDATION TO CARRY CB
120400 AS AMENDED.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER AYE 33.
>> AYE.
>> MOSQUEDA .
>> AYE.
>> NELSON.
>> AYE.
>> PEDERSON.
>> AYE.
>> STRAUSS. IT AYE.
>> THAT CARRIES. THE BILL WILL
BE SENT TO THE SEPTEMBER 27 COUL
MEETING FOR CONSIDERATION.
MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER FOUR
AND THAT IS THE BRIEFING
DISCUSSION ON 120401. CLERK,
WILL YOU PLEASE READ THE SHORT E
SHORT TITLE?
>> AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO
CORRECTING TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS,
ERRORS, CORRECTING SECTION REFE,
CLARIFYING REGULATIONS, AND
MAKING MINOR AMENDMENTS. ADDING
A NEW SECTION.
>> WE ARE JOINED BY MIKE
PODOWSKI AND EMILY, FROM THE
SDCI . I DO SEE THAT COUNCIL
MEMBER PEDERSON HAS QUESTION ON
THIS ITEM.
>> THANK YOU, CHAIR, STRAUSS.
THIS IS FOR CENTRAL STAFF. WE
HAVE HEARD CONCERNS ABOUT
CHANGES REGARDING LIGHT AND
GLARE AND IT ALSO IMPACTS AESTH.
IMPACTS AESTHETICS. THE
REFERENCE TO TRANSPORTATION IS
JUST REARRANGING WHERE THAT
ALREADY EXISTED. ARE WE REQUIRED
REQUIRED TO DO THIS TO COMPLY WH
COMPLY WITH NEW STATE LAW?
>> THAT IS CORRECT. LAST WEEK
AND THIS WEEK THE COMMITTEE
HEARD TESTIMONY FROM MULTIPLE
PEOPLE ABOUT PROPOSED CHANGING S
CHANGING IS CHANGES TO THE
OMNIBUS BILL IF THEY HAVE BEEN
SUBJECT TO DESIGN REVIEW ON THES
THE BASIS OF AESTHETICS AND
LIGHT AND GLARE. IT IS A
THRESHOLD QUESTION THAT HAS BEEN
PROPOSED ON WHETHER THIS
COMMITTEE AND THE COUNCIL AS A
WHOLE HAS DISCRETION TO CHANGE T
CHANGE THAT BECAUSE OF THE
RECENT CHANGES IN SHORT LAW AND
STATE LAW AND, THEY DO NOT HAVE
THE DISCRETION TO DO THAT.
>> THANK YOU. THANK YOU, CHAIR.
>> THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER
PEDERSON. THESE ARE NOT DISCREY
CHANGES. THIS IS JUST BRINGING S
IN LINE WITH STATE LAW. ANY
OTHER QUESTIONS. COUNCIL MEMBER?
MEMBER NELSON? SEEING AS WE HAVE
WE HAVE NO FURTHER -- [
INDISCERNIBLE - MUFFLED ] SEE
NO COMMENTS, LET'S CALL THE
ROLL.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER MOSQUEDA.
AYE.
>> VICE CHAIR MORALES.
>> YES.
>> CHAIRS STRAUSS .
>> YES.
>> THE MOTION CARRIES ON CB
120401 AND THIS WILL GO BEFORE
THE COUNCIL FOR FINAL
CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU, MIKE
AND EMILY, FOR JOINING US. ITEM
NUMBER FIVE IS REGARDING 120405
AND THAT IS AN ORDINANCE
RELATING TO LAND USE AND ZONING
IN CROWN HILL. CLERK, WILL YOU
PLEASE READ THIS.
>> COUNSEL BILL 120405, AN
ORDINANCE RELATING TO LAND USE
AND ZONING AMENDING SECTION
23.41 .010 THE CBS OLD MUNICIPAL
OLD MUNICIPAL CODE TO APPROVE TE
CROWNE HILL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN.
>> SO, ANY FURTHER COMMENTS FROM
FROM A LAST TIME. CROWNE HILL
HAD AN OLD ZONE AND THESE WERE A
A PROCESS OVER MANY YEARS. WE
PASSED THIS ACTION PLAN LAST
YEAR AND I AM EXCITED TO PASS
DESIGN GUIDELINES. ANY COMMENTS,
KATY HAIMA?
>> NONE.
>> I THINK YOU'VE GOT IT ALL.
>>
>> COLLEAGUES, ANY QUESTIONS,
COMMENTS, OR CONCERNS. SEEING
NONE I RECOMMEND THAT WE PASS
120405.
>> IT HAS BEEN MOVED AND
SECONDED . ANY COMMENTS? WILL
THE CLERK PLEASE CALL THE ROLL
ON THE RECOMMENDATION TO PASS
THE BILL.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER MOSQUEDA.
>> AYE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER NELSON.
>> AYE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER PEDERSON.
>> AYE.
>> VICE CHAIR MORALES.
>> YES.
>> CHAIRS STRAUSS.
>> YES.
>> COUNSEL BILL 120405 PASSES AD
WE WILL SEND THIS TO THE CITY
COUNCIL FOR FINAL PASSAGE. WE AE
VERY EXCITED FOR THIS. YOU DO
NOT NEED TO COME ON TUESDAY. OUR
OUR NEXT ITEM IS ITEM NUMBER SIX
SIX AND THAT IS COUNSEL BILL
120394 AND THAT IS RELATED TO
LAND USE AND ZONING AMENDING IMT
AMENDING IMPLEMENT CHANGES TO
SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF
TOWNHOUSES AND ROW HOUSES.
>> WE ARE JOINED BY THE -- ONE
IS FROM MYSELF AND ONE IS FROM
COUNCIL MEMBER PEDERSON .
BRENNAN, WILL YOU TAKE US AWAY
>> GOOD AFTERNOON. THESE ARE
MINOR CHANGES TO THE ZONING REGS
ZONING REGULATIONS TO FACILITATE
TOWN HOUSES AND RELATED TO --
AND DEVELOPMENT.
>> ANY QUESTIONS ON THE
UNDERLYING BILL. I'M GOING TO
RECOMMEND THE BILL SO THAT WE
CAN BREATHE BRING THE
AMENDMENTS. I MOVE THE THE
COMMITTEE PASS 120394. IS THEREA
SECOND?
>> SECOND.
>> IT HAS BEEN MOVED AND
SECONDED TO PASS COUNSEL BILL
120394 AND I WOULD LIKE TO
AMENDED AS PRESENTED AS
AMENDMENT ONE ON THE AGENDA. ISE
IS THERE A SECOND?
>> SECOND.
>> IT HAS BEEN MOVED AND SECOND.
AND SECONDED. WILL COUNCIL STAFS
STAFF TREES PLEASE DESCRIBE IT.
LISH.
>> ONE OF THE CHANGES THAT THE L
MAKES IS TO ALLOW LONG-TERM
PARKING TO BE LOCATED IN
SETBACKS AND BETWEEN RESIDENTIAS
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES AT -- INS
IN SETBACKS IT IS THE LAST IN AN
AN ENCLOSED STRUCTURES AND
BETWEEN BUILDINGS IT WOULD BE
ALLOWED IN ENCLOSED STRUCTURES
SO SMALL BIKE STORAGE
FACILITIES. THE AMENDMENT WOULD
LIMIT THE CHANGE TO TOWNHOUSE
PROJECTS ONLY. RATHER THAN MULTI
MULTI FAMILY STRUCTURES. THE
DISCUSSION LAST WEEK DISCUSSED
THAT THIS IS BIKE PARKING IS AN
ISSUE FOR TOWNHOUSE PROJECTS AND
AND IT WOULD ALLOW BICYCLES TO
BE PARKED IN THE BIKE PARKING
STRUCTURES RATHER THAN JUST
REQUIRED BICYCLES.
>> LISH, CAN YOU SHARE A SCREEN
SO, COLLEAGUES, THIS IS THE AMT
THE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW MORE FLEY
MORE FLEXIBILITY WITH BIKE
PARKING BY REMOVING A PLACE THAT
THAT WE CREATED PLANT A TREE ORR
SURFACE AND RATHER THAN MAKING
THIS CHANGE FOR ALL BUT BY
FAMILY BUILDINGS WE HAVE
NARROWED SPECIFICALLY TO TOWNHO.
TO TOWNHOMES. ARE THERE ANY QUES
ON THIS AT THIS TIME. SEEING
NON-, IT HAS BEEN MOVED AND
SECONDED AND I WILL ASK THE CLEK
TO CALL THE ROLL OWNED
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER MOSQUEDA.
>> AYE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER NELSON.
>> AYE .
>> COUNCIL MEMBER PEDERSON.
>> AYE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER MORALES.
>> YES .
>> CHAIRS STRAUSS.
>> YES.
>> THE MOTION CARRIES AND
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE IS ADOPTED.
WE NOW MOVE ON TO AMENDMENT
NUMBER TWO. COUNCIL MEMBER
PEDERSON .
>> COLLEAGUES, I MOVE TO AMEND
120394 WITH AMENDMENT NUMBER FR
NUMBER FOUR IT WAS PUBLISHED ONE
AGENDA TODAY.
>> SECOND.
>> IT A MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND
AND SECONDED. TO A DEPTH ADOPT
AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO.
>> THANK YOU, CHAIR, I CHOOSE TO
TO HAVE CENTRAL STAFF EXPLAIN IT
AND THEN I WOULD LOVE TO SPEAK
TO IT.
>> SO, THIS AMENDMENT WOULD ADD
TWO CLAUSES THAT TIE THE BILL TO
THE ADOPTION OF THE NEXT UPDATE
UPDATE TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AND THEN INDICATE THAT THE BILS
BILL IS -- AND OTHER CITY
DEPARTMENTS TO ANALYZE THE
IMPACTS OF THE CHANGES INCLUDING
CHANGES INCLUDING THE BILL. ANDT
SETS AN EXPIRATION DATE OF
EITHER THE 2024 COMPREHENSIVE
UPDATE OR THE END OF 2024.
>> THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER
PEDERSON.
>> THANK YOU, CHAIR STRAUSS.
THIS WOULD MOVE FORWARD ONLY ASA
FULL PILOT PROGRAM. A PILOT
PROGRAM THAT WOULD REQUIRE CITY
DEPARTMENTS TO STUDY AND PACKS
AND THE PILOT PROGRAM THAT WOULD
TIME OUR DECISION ON WHETHER TO
TO MAKE IT PERMANENT WITH
CONSIDERATION OF THE PLAN. I
BELIEVE THIS BILL IS A BIG
ENOUGH CHANGE TO OUR LAND USE PS
THAT MAKING IT PERMANENT SHOULD
BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE COE
PLAN PROCESS ALREADY UNDERWAY
AND AFTER WE HAVE PUT IN PLACE A
A STRONG TREE PROTECTION ORDINA.
PROTECTION ORDINANCE. IF WE
ADOPT THIS TODAY IT COULD SOON
COME INTO CONFLICT WITH OTHER CY
GOALS AS WE TRIED TO BALANCE
DENSITY WHILE PROTECTING AFFORDE
HOUSING AND THE DWINDLING CAN'T
TREE CANOPY. WE HAVE WANTED CITY
CITY HALL TO RELAX THIS OVER THT
THREE YEARS. WE JUST LEARNED THT
SEATTLE HAS LOST 255 ACRES OF
TREES SINCE 2016. THE CITY
POLICY IS TO INCREASE TREE
CANOPY. I BELIEVE WE SHOULD PROD
SHOULD PROCEED CAUTIOUSLY. IT
REQUIRES DEVELOPERS TO JUMP
THROUGH HOOPS BECAUSE THE
EXISTING CODE WAS NOT
NECESSARILY ENVISIONED,
CLEARCUTTING THE LOTS OF THE
TREES FOR TOWNHOMES. IT IS
HAPPENING BECAUSE TOWNHOME
DEVELOPERS ARE TAKING ADVANTAGE
OF THE CODE WORKING AROUND IT.
IT IS A TIME-CONSUMING PROCESS
BUT NOT WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY
ENVISIONED FOR THE EXISTING CODE
EXISTING CODE SO THAT IS WHY WE
SHOULD CONSIDER THIS PART OF THE
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PROCS
PLANNING PROCESS SO WE CAN VIEW
THESE CHANGES HOLISTICALLY. WE
HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO MAKE THIS
CHANGE. IT DOES NOT CREATE LOW
INCOME HOUSING. SO, WHY NOT
SPEND OUR TIME REQUIRING LOW
INCOME HOUSING INSTEAD OF GIVINY
GIVING AWAY CAPACITY WITHOUT RE.
WITHOUT RETURN. LET'S HAVE THEM
BUILD STACK FLATS SO WE CAN INCE
CAN INCREASE CAPACITY. THE STATE
LEGISLATURE ENCOURAGES
HOMEOWNERSHIP WE CAN ALSO BUILD
MORE RENTAL UNITS. WE WANT TO --
-- IT DOES MAKE IT EASIER FOR
FOR PROFIT DEVELOPERS TO CLEAR .
CLEAR TREES. IT IS UNCLEAR IF
THIS IS THE OUTCOME THAT WE
WANT. LET'S LET IT GO FORWARD
BUT TESTED. LET'S LOOK AT IF WE
WILL SEE AN INCREASE AFFORDABLE
HOUSING? WHAT IT WILL DO TO LOW
AND MODERATE INCOME --.
HOPEFULLY YOU ARE A YES VOTE ON
AMENDMENT TWO.
>> I WILL ADDRESS A FEW THINGS.E
THINGS. THESE TOWNHOMES MAY NOT
FIT INTO AFFORDABLE HOUSING BUT,
I SHARED WITH THE COMMITTEE
LAST WEEK MY EXPERIENCE ON 63rd
STREET MARIE HAD FOUR YEARS OF T
OF DEVELOPMENT AND THE RATES REY
DID CHANGE. WE HAD ON THE RENTER
RENTED FOR $1300 PER MONTH AND
IT TURN INTO THREE HOMETOWNS AND
HOMETOWNS AND THAT DID NOT
CREATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING BUT IT
IT DID ALLOW ME TO BRING $10
MILLION WORTH OF AFFORDABLE HOUG
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DOLLARS INTOE
INTO THE COMMUNITY. IT MIGHT BE
HARD FOR US TO SEE THE DIRECT
IMPACT BUT IT IS OCCURRING IN
THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AREAS. I
WILL ALSO ADD THAT WHILE THIS IS
IS A PROCEDURAL BILL, THE
ABILITY FOR HOMEBUILDERS TO BUID
FOUR TOWNHOMES AND, ACTUALLY,
LISH, CAN YOU PULL UP THE PRESEN
FROM LAST WEEK ? I JUST WANT TO
SPEAK TO THE SLIDE THAT SHOWS
THE DELINEATION WITHIN THESE LO.
THESE LOTS.
>> THIS ONE?
>> YES. WHAT WE ARE SEEING RIGH,
AND MAYBE, LISH, CAN YOU EXPLAIN
EXPLAIN THIS?
>> UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING
THERE ARE -- ROW HOUSES ARE DIST
FROM TOWNHOUSES BECAUSE ROW
HOUSES ARE LOCATED ALONG THE STT
THE STREET AND THEY HAVE STREET
FACING ENTRANCES. THEY ARE NOT
PERMITTED TO HAVE ANOTHER
BUILDING ON THE LOT BETWEEN THE
ROWHOUSE AND THE PROPERTY LINE.
THEY ALSO HAVE LOWER -- CURRENTY
-- CURRENTLY -- THEY HAVE -- YOU
YOU WERE ABLE TO BUILD MORE ROW
HOUSES ON A LOT IN A TOWNHOUSE
BASED ON DENSITY LAWS. AS A
RESULT, DEVELOPERS ARE CHOOSINGO
CHOOSING TO GO THROUGH THE
SUBDIVISION PROCESS AND CREATE
TWO SEPARATE LOTS. ONE FOR
TOWNHOUSES BEHIND A ROWHOUSE LOT
LOT AND THE BILL IS INTENDED TOE
THE INCENTIVE OR, REMOVE THE
DENSITY INCENTIVE THAT ENCOURAGS
THAT ENCOURAGES THE ADDITIONAL.
QUESTIONS?
>> WHAT THIS HELPS ME TO UNDERSD
IS THAT WE ARE CREATING A
PROCEDURAL STEP TO GET TO THE
SAME OUTCOME. WITH OR WITHOUT
THIS, WE WILL HAVE THE SAME
OUTCOME BUT WE HAVE A FASTER AND
AND LESS EXPENSIVE PROCESS TO
BUILD THE HOUSING THAT WE
DESPERATELY NEED IN OUR CITY.
COUNCIL MEMBER PEDERSON , THE LT
THE LAST POINT I WILL SHARE ABOT
SHARE ABOUT TREES, I AM STANDING
AM STANDING RIGHT HERE WITH YOU
READY TO BRING THE TREE ORDINANE
TREE ORDINANCE TO THE COMMITTEED
WE WILL BE ADDRESSING THIS AS A
SEPARATE AND RELATED ISSUE. FOR
THESE REASONS I CANNOT SUPPORT
YOUR AMENDMENT TODAY, COUNCIL
MEMBER PEDERSON BUT I DO
APPRECIATE THE INTENT . I DO SEE
COUNCIL MEMBER NELSON HAS HER
HAND RAISED. COUNCIL MEMBER NEL.
MEMBER NELSON.
>> THANK YOU. IF YOU LOOK AT
THAT PICTURE RIGHT THERE, SPEAKG
OF TREES, THIS DOES NOT SEEM TO
CHANGE THE AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR
TREES. THAT IS ONE THING THAT I
AM STRUGGLING WITH. I DON'T SEE
THAT THIS AMENDMENT WILL NECESSY
PROTECT TREES IT LOOKS LIKE IT
DOES NOT CHANGE THE AREA. MY
REAL POINT IS, I DON'T SEE THISN
THIS LEGISLATION AS A RELAXING
OF THE LAND USE POLICIES AS
COUNCIL MEMBER PEDERSON SAYS.
WHAT I SEE THIS IS IS AS LEGISLN
AS LEGISLATION REMOVING
IMPEDIMENTS TO BUILDING MORE HO.
MORE HOUSING. WE NEED TO ALIGN
OUR REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT WITH
POLICY GOALS. IF A HOUSING IS
THE GOAL, WHETHER IT IS
PRIVATELY CONSTRUCT DID ARE
BUILT BY NONPROFIT PROVIDERS, WD
WE NEED HOUSING SO I THINK, WE
CANNOT CONFLATE AFFORDABLE
HOUSING NEEDS AND WHAT THIS IS
ACTUALLY TRYING TO DO. THIS IS ,
IS ACTUALLY, TOWNHOMES ARE A
PATH TO HOME OWNERSHIP AND THATS
WHY IT IS IMPORTANT. WE NEED TO
MAKE IT LESS EXPENSIVE AND MORE
AFFORDABLE TO BUILD TOWNHOMES. I
I NOTED LAST TIME, DEVELOPERS
CAN ALREADY BUILD FOUR UNITS PER
PER LOT BUT IT IS MORE COSTLY.
THE LIMITATIONS REQUIRE
$8000-$10,000 IN TERMS OF
PERMITTING COSTS AND ALL OF THE
HOOKUPS AND ETC.. IT ALSO PROLOS
THE PROCESS FOR GETTING A PERMIT
PERMIT TO BUILD. I APPRECIATE
THIS IS TRYING TO GO INTO THE UE
THE UPDATE BUT BECAUSE THIS IS
NOT A CHANGE IN POLICY, THIS
DOES NOT NEED TO BE IN THE COMP
PLAN. IF I WERE A BUILDER
THINKING ABOUT MY PIPELINE OF
PROJECTS, HAVING AN ENDING WOULD
WOULD MAKE ME THINK ABOUT
BUILDING ELSEWHERE BECAUSE THAT
IS NOT A LONG TIMELINE. FOR, ALL
ALL OF THESE REASONS I OPPOSE
THIS AMENDMENT. WE NEED TO MAKE
IT EASIER AND LESS EXPENSIVE TO
BUILD HOMES IN SEATTLE. SO, I WL
BE VOTING NO ON THIS.
>> THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER
NELSON. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? O?
OR COMMENTS? WE HAVE NO FURTHER.
FURTHER COMMENTS. COUNCIL MEMBER
MEMBER PEDERSON, WOULD YOU LIKEO
MAKE ANY CLOSING STATEMENTS?
>>
>> I KNOW WE WILL BE HAVING DISS
LIKE THIS FREQUENTLY OVER THE
NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS. HAVING A
TEMPLATE FOR US TO HAVE THE
DISCUSSION IS HELPFUL. I JUST WT
JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT, MY
AMENDMENT ALLOWS THIS TO GO FOR.
GO FORWARD. SOMETIMES, IT HAS NT
BEEN TRACKED AND THAT IT IS HARO
HARD TO RECONCILE WHAT WE ARE SG
VERSUS WHAT THEY ARE TELLING US.
US. THIS WOULD REQUIRE STUDY.
AND THEN THE CERTAINTY WOULD
STILL BE THERE THROUGH DECEMBER4
BECAUSE, ONCE IT A DEVELOPER VE,
DEVELOPER VESTS, THEY GET TO
BUILD IT. SO IF THEY VEST ON
DECEMBER 25, 2024, THEY CAN TAKE
TAKE THE NEXT TWO YEARS TO BUILD
BUILD THE PROJECT. WOULD BE THE
OUTCOME IS THAT HE IS THE COUNCL
WOULD CHOOSE TO MAKE IT PERMANET
IT PERMANENT WE WOULD BE DOING
IT IN A WAY THAT WE HAVE DATA
AND WE ARE DOING IT WITH A HOLIC
A HOLISTIC LENS. AGAIN, THIS
WOULD BE A YES BUT TEST AND YES
BUT STUDY. I AM SORRY TO HEAR
THE COMMENTS THAT I UNDERSTAND.
THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER
PEDERSON. WITH THE CLERK PLEASE
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER MOSQUEDA.
>> NO.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER NELSON.
>> NO.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER PEDERSON.
>> YES.
>> VICE-CHAIR MORALES.
>> NO.
>> CHAIR STRAUSS .
>> NO.
>> THE MOTION FAILS AND AMENDMET
AND AMENDMENT TWO IS NOT ADOPTE.
NOT ADOPTED. ARE THERE ANY FURTR
COMMENTS ON THE AMENDED BILL. Y,
BILL. YES, COUNCIL MEMBER
MOSQUEDA.
>> THAT WAS AN ENTHUSIASTIC HANE
ON MY PART. I WANT TO SAY THANKU
THANK YOU ON BRINGING THE
LEGISLATION TO US. I AM EXCITEDT
WE ARE MOVING FORWARD AND I WANO
SHARE MY ENTHUSIASM ON WHAT THE
LEGISLATION WILL ACCOMPLISH.
SINCE I GOT ON THE COUNCIL FIVE
YEARS AGO I'VE BEEN HEARING
ABOUT THE NEED TO ADDRESS THIS .
THIS ISSUE. I THINK THAT THE
COMMUNITY ACROSS THE BOARD RECOE
THAT THIS IS ONE SMALL PART OF
HOW WE CAN HELP DEVELOP MORE MIG
HOUSING OPTIONS LIKE TOWNHOMES
AND ROW HOMES AND OTHER FORMS OF
OF -- TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY HAS
HAS A PLACE TO CALL HOME. THIS S
BEING LAYERED TO CREATE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPTIONS OVERL
ACROSS THE CITY AND I THINK IT
IS IMPORTANT ANYTIME WE PASS
HOUSING RELATED LEGISLATION THAT
THAT THIS ALONE WILL NOT SOLVE
THE HOUSING CRISIS AND WE MUST D
THIS AS WE HAVE DONE IN THE PAST
PAST TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE GG
AT THE ROOT CAUSE OF WHY THERE
IS NO INADEQUATE HOUSING. I WANT
WANT IS TO -- AND I LOOK FORWARD
FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU TO E
TO CHANGE THE ZONING CODE TO
ALLOW MORE HOUSING OPTIONS TO BE
BE BUILT AROUND THE CITY AND I K
FORWARD TO WORKING WITH THE
COUNCIL TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE
ARE INVESTING MORE MONEY INTO
HOMEOWNERSHIP OPTIONS, ESPECIALY
OPTIONS, ESPECIALLY FIRST-TIME
HOME OWNERSHIP OPTIONS. AND I
WANT TO SAY YOU COULD TO THE
PEOPLE AS WE WORKED ON THE
JUMPSTART PROGRAM. $97 MILLION
THIS YEAR WANT TO MULTI FAMILY S
AND FIRST-TIME HOME OWNERSHIP.
THIS IS ONE COMPONENT IN A
BROADER CONVERSATION WITH THE
MULTIFACETED APPROACH TO MAKE
SURE THAT WE ARE DEVELOPING
HOUSING AND I WANT TO UNDERSCORE
UNDERSCORE THAT WE ARE NOT
TALKING EXCLUSIVELY ABOUT BUILDG
ABOUT BUILDING AFFORDABLE
HOUSING OR FOR LOW AND MIDDLE IE
MIDDLE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS BUT IT
DOES CREATE AFFORDABLE OPTIONS
AROUND SEATTLE BY INCREASING THY
FOR FOLKS TO HAVE MORE PLACES TO
TO PURCHASE AND LIVE ACROSS THE
CITY. THE SEATTLE TIMES RECENTLY
TIMES RECENTLY REPORTED THAT THE
THE HIGH AMOUNT OF PEOPLE MOVINO
THE REGION HAVE HIGHER INCOMES
SO WHEN THEY PURCHASE A HOME,
THEY ARE PRICING OUT WORKING
FAMILIES IN THE REGION. INSTEAD
OF BEING PRICED OUT AND PUSHED
OUT AND THUS HAVING TO COMMUTE
HOURS INTO SEATTLE, WHEN WE CREE
HOUSING OF ALL TYPES INCLUDING
TOWNHOUSES AND ROW HOUSES, IT
CREATES AN AFFORDABLE OPTION.
THE $600,000 TIME TOWNHOUSES ARA
GREAT EXAMPLE OF A MORE
AFFORDABLE OPTION FOR WORKING
FAMILIES IN THE MEDIAN AVERAGE
COST OF A NEW HOUSE WHICH IS
NEAR $1 MILLION. WHEN WE DON'T
CREATE ENOUGH HOUSING, IN GENERL
IN GENERAL, INCLUDING MARKET
RATE HOUSING, IT HAS -- THAT
ENDS UP PRICING OUT LOW AND
MIDDLE INCOME FOLKS FROM HAVING
FIRST-TIME HOME OWNERSHIP
HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES OR
AFFORDABLE RENTAL UNITS. TIME
AND TIME AGAIN WE TALK ABOUT THE
THE -- STUDY THAT LOOKS AT THAT
DOWNWARD PRESSURE OVER THE LASTW
YEARS INCLUDING HOW IT HAS
EFFECT DID METAL WAGE AND
LOW-WAGE WORKERS IN THE REGION.
I APPRECIATE THAT THIS IS ONE CT
OF A BROADER CONVERSATION THAT
WE NEED TO HAVE ABOUT CREATING
MORE OPTIONS FOR LOW-INCOME
WORKERS AND CREATE OPPORTUNITIER
OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOME OWNERSHIP
OWNERSHIP AND HOW WE CAN CREATE
OPPORTUNITY FOR PEOPLE TO LIVE
IN THE CITY THAT THEIR WORK,
LIVE, PLAY, STUDY. THANK YOU, FR
, FOR ALL OF THE WORK THAT HAS
GONE INTO THIS. I DON'T THINK TE
OPTIONS ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.
WE ARE WORKING TO GREAT DENSITYD
DENSITY AND OPPORTUNITY IN SEAT.
IN SEATTLE.
>> WELL SAID, COUNCIL MEMBER
MOSQUEDA. TOWNHOMES CAN BE BEAL
BE BEAUTIFUL AND IT COMES DOWN O
THE SITE WORK IT IS NOT THE ACTL
STRUCTURE ITSELF. I HAD AN EXPEE
THIS LAST WEEK ON THE SEVENTH
FLOOR OF A MULTIFAMILY BUILDING
ON 22nd AVENUE WHEN I LOOK OUT
OVER THE AREA THAT HAS BEEN UP .
UP ZONED. THE TOWNHOMES CAME
TOGETHER IN A VERY NICE FABRIC.
THERE IS A WAY FORWARD. I WILL
SHARE MORE ON THAT LATER.
COUNCIL MEMBER NELSON . I SEE
YOU HAVE YOUR HAND RAISED.
>> I HAPPENED TO VISIT A LOT OF
TOWNHOMES LAST YEAR AND MANY ARE
ARE VERY BEAUTIFUL. SO, THANK
YOU, VERY MUCH, FOR BRINGING
THIS FORWARD. I ECHO WHAT
COUNCIL MEMBER MOSQUEDA SAID
ABOUT CREATING MORE OPTIONS.
ANOTHER THING IS, BECAUSE THEY
ARE SOMETIMES THE FIRST HOMES
THAT PEOPLE IN OUR AFFORDABLE
HOUSING -- THAT IS SUBSIDIZE
THAT FREEZE UP THE UNITS FOR
OTHER PEOPLE. TO MOVE INTO
LIMITED SUPPLY. THANK YOU, FOR
BRINGING THIS FORWARD AND I WANT
WANT TO SEE YOU COULD TO THE DET
FOR THE HARD WORK THAT WENT INT.
IT HAS BEEN A LONG CALL. THANK .
THANK YOU.
>> ANY FURTHER COMMENTS ON THE
BILL AS AMENDED? SEEING NO
FURTHER COMMENTS, WILL THE CLERE
CALL THE ROLL .
>> COUNCIL MEMBER MOSQUEDA.
>> AYE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER NELSON .
>> AYE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER PEDERSON.
>> NO.
>> VICE-CHAIR MORALES.
>> YES.
>> CHAIR STRAUSS.
>> YES.
>> I APPRECIATE THE ROBUST
CONVERSATION ON THE FINAL ITEM S
COUNCIL BILL 314447. CLERK,
WILL YOU PLEASE READ THE SHORT
DESCRIPTION.
>> COUNCIL BILL 314447.
APPLICATION OF ISOLA HOMES TO
REZONE A PORTION OF A SPLIT
ZONED SITE LOCATED AT 7012 ROOST
WAY NE FROM LOWRISE 1
MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH ANM
MANDATORY HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
SUFFIX LR1 (M) TO NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL 2 WITH A 55 FOOT
HEIGHT LIMIT AND M1 MHA SUFFIX
(NC2 55 (M1)) (PROJECT
3035227-LU; TYPE IV).
>> I'M GOING TO WELCOME LISH
WHITSON .
>> I WILL JUST PULL UP THE PRESN
THAT YOU SAW LAST WEEK TO REMINU
REMIND YOU -- AND -- THE SITE IT
IS THAT THE CORNER OF 71st AND
ROOSEVELT WAY. THIS IS ACE LIT
ZONE LOT AND THE PROPOSAL IS TOE
THE LOWRISE -- IN THIS SECTION F
THE LOT TO A NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL TO A 55 ZONE WITH THE
THE ROOSEVELT STATION OVERLAY
ADDED. THE REASON WOULD FACILITE
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A [
INDISCERNABLE ] APARTMENT BUILD.
APARTMENT BUILDING. I AM HAPPY
TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
>> THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER
PEDERSON . COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS?
>> JUST TO REITERATE WHAT I SAID
I SAID AT THE LAST COMMITTEE
MEETING. THIS IS A REALLY
INTERESTING EXAMPLE OF DENSITY D
DENSITY AND TREES AND
DEVELOPMENT THAT IS OCCURRING CE
TO HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT. YOU
CAN SEE THE TRADE-OFF HAPPENING
IN REAL TIME WITH THIS PROJECT
BECAUSE IT IS A CONTRACT REZONE.
WE JUST GET THE CLERK FILE AT
THE END OF THE PROCESS AND WE
HAVE TO GO THROUGH ALL OF THE
INFORMATION AT ONCE. HERE, WE
HAVE LEARNED THAT, I THINK SEVEN
SEVEN OF THE UNITS WILL BE LOW
INCOME UNITS BUILT ON SITE AND T
IS SOMETHING THAT WE WANT TO SES
DO MORE OF. SO I WANT TO COMMEND
COMMEND THE DEVELOPER. THERE IS
A BEAUTIFUL TREE THERE THAT WILL
THAT WILL BE TAKEN DOWN. IT IS T
AN EXCEPTIONAL TREE BUT, IT
APPEARS, IF IT IS NOT TAKEN
DOWN, YOU COULD NOT BUILD SO
MANY UNITS. SO, THIS TRADE-OFF
IS SOMETHING THAT WE -- AND I
HAVE HAD STITCHER WINS COMPLAIN
ABOUT THIS PROJECT. IT IS SO
CLOSE TO THE ROOSEVELT LIGHT
RAIL STATION. I KNOW THERE WAS H
A THOROUGH COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT.
ENGAGEMENT PROCESS. IT IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE SPEARHEAD O.
OF THAT. I THINK THAT THIS IS AF
A TRADE-OFF THAT IS WORTH MAKING
MAKING IN THIS CASE. THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER
PEDERSON. ANY OTHER COUNCIL
MEMBERS? SEEING NONE, ANYTHING
ELSE? CLERK -- ACTUALLY -- DO I
DO HAVE A QUESTION. LISH, DO WE
HAVE THE DEVELOPER AGREEMENT ?
>> YOU HAVE A DRAFT OF OF
COUNSEL FINDINGS, CONDITIONS,
AND DECISION DOCUMENT ATTACHED
TO MY MEMO FOR THIS MEETING. THE
THE NEXT STEP IS TO PLACE A
CLEAN VERSION OF THAT IN THE
CLERK FILE. I AM WORKING WITH
THE APPLICANT TO GET THE
PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
AND I ANTICIPATE GETTING THAT NT
WEEK. THAT WOULD PUT US IN PLACE
PLACE TO GET A COUNCIL BILL TO
GET THE COUNCIL BILL REINTRODUCD
FOR COUNSEL VOTE ON OCTOBER 11.E
COUNCIL HAS UNTIL NOVEMBER 1 TO
ACT ON THIS SO IF, FOR ANY
REASON, THEY ARE NOT ABLE TO GET
GET ME THE [ INDISCERNABLE ]
NEXT WEEK, THE COUNSEL VOTE
COULD BE DELAYED BY A WEEK BUT,
I ANTICIPATE WE WILL BE READY OE
ON TIME.
>> SO, THE DO WE NEED TO GRANT S
AS CONDITIONED?
>> FIRST, I THINK MOVE TO -- ON
THE CLERK FILE AND THEN -- I'M
GOING TO SAY THIS ONE MORE TIME.
MORE TIME.
>> MOVED TO OF THE FINDINGS CONN
TO THE CLERK FILE.
>> MOVE TO ADD THE FINDINGS --
CONCLUSIONS AND DECISIONS TO
THIS FILE. IS THERE A SECOND?
>> SECOND.
>> THANK YOU. WILL THE CLERK PLE
CALL THE ROLL .
>> COUNCIL MEMBER MOSQUEDA .
>> AYE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER NELSON.
>> AYE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER PEDERSON.
>> AYE.
>> VICE-CHAIR MORALES.
>> YES.
>> CHAIR STRAUSS.
>> AYE.
>> NO FURTHER QUESTIONS, COMME,
QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, OR CONCERN.
OR CONCERNS. AT THIS TIME, I
RECOMMEND THAT CB 314447 IS
EXCEPTED . ARE THERE ANY FURTHE?
SEEING NONE, WILL THE CLERK
THESE CALL THE ROLL.
>> IT COUNCIL MEMBER MOSQUEDA .
>> AYE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER NELSON.
>> AYE.
>> COUNCIL MEMBER PEDERSON .
>> AYE.
>> VICE-CHAIR MORALES.
>> YES.
>> CHAIR STRAUSS .
>> YES.
>> FIVE IN FAVOR AND NONE
OPPOSED.
>> BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ADJOURN,
THE COUNSEL WILL NEED TO BE
SUSPENDED CONSIDERING ACTION
TAKEN TODAY AFTER 12:00 NOON AND
AND TO ALLOW AGENDA ITEMS ONE
THROUGH SIX TO GO BEFORE THE
CITY COUNCIL. THE COUNCIL
PRESIDENT HAS CONCURRED WITH
THIS REQUEST. IF THERE IS NO
OBJECTION, ANY ACTION AFTER NOON
NOON WILL BE SUSPENDED.
>> CHAIR STRAUSS, JUST TO
UNDERSTAND, THE BILL WHERE
THERE WAS A NO VOTE WILL THAT GO
THAT GO ON SEPTEMBER 27 BECAUSE
THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAS
CONCURRED?
>> WE CAN HOLD THAT BILL, IF YOU
YOU WOULD LIKE THAT.
>> I WAS JUST TRYING TO UNDERST.
TO UNDERSTAND. WE ARE SUSPENDINT
SUSPENDING THAT JUST BECAUSE OF
THE TIME OF DAY. THE OTHER THING
THING IS SEPARATE, I THINK.
>> WE WILL WORK WITH THE CLERKS
TO RESOLVE THE WRINKLES. WE WILL
WILL IRON THAT OUT.
>> THANK YOU.
>> ANY OBJECTIONS TO THE 12:00 N
ROLL ? THE AGENDA ITEMS ONE
THROUGH SIX CAVEATS AND POSSIBLY
THE NOT UNANIMOUS BILL WILL GO
TO THE SEPTEMBER 27 COUNCIL MEEG
FOR FINAL CONSIDERATION. THIS
CONCLUDES THE THURSDAY,
SEPTEMBER 22 LAND USE COMMITTEE
MEETING. THIS WILL BE THE LAST
COMMITTEE MEETING UNTIL DECEMBE.
THANK YOU, COLLEAGUES, FOR ATTE.
FOR ATTENDING. WE WILL HAVE COME
AGAIN IN DECEMBER.
>> THANK YOU, CHAIR.